|
||||||
|
This is a post refuting part of the CreationWiki response to Talk.Origins’s “Index to Creationist Claims”. Click here for an introduction to this project. Quotes from CreationWiki are in red, while quotes from Talk.Origins are in blue. The eye is too complex to have evolved. » Continue reading “CB301: “The eye is too complex to have evolved”” This is a post refuting part of the CreationWiki response to Talk.Origins’s “Index to Creationist Claims”. Click here for an introduction to this project. Quotes from CreationWiki are in red, while quotes from Talk.Origins are in blue. Practically all “vestigial” organs in man have been shown to have definite uses and not to be vestigial at all. » Continue reading “CB360: “Vestigial organs may have functions”” This is a post refuting part of the CreationWiki response to Talk.Origins’s “Index to Creationist Claims”. Click here for an introduction to this project. Quotes from CreationWiki are in red, while quotes from Talk.Origins are in blue. Mutations only vary traits that are already there. They do not produce anything new. » Continue reading “CB101.2: “Mutations don’t produce new features”” This is a post refuting part of the CreationWiki response to Talk.Origins’s “Index to Creationist Claims”. Click here for an introduction to this project. Quotes from CreationWiki are in red, while quotes from Talk.Origins are in blue. So-called junk DNA is not really junk. Functions have been found for noncoding DNA which was previously thought to be junk, and we cannot be sure that the rest of the junk DNA is not functional as well. This is a post refuting part of the CreationWiki response to Talk.Origins’s “Index to Creationist Claims”. Click here for an introduction to this project. Quotes from CreationWiki are in red, while quotes from Talk.Origins are in blue. Pasteur and other scientists disproved the concept of spontaneous generation and established the “law of biogenesis” — that life comes only from previous life. » Continue reading “CB000: Pasteur proved life only comes from life” This is a post refuting part of the CreationWiki response to Talk.Origins’s “Index to Creationist Claims”. Click here for an introduction to this project. Quotes from CreationWiki are in red, while quotes from Talk.Origins are in blue. “It is inconceivable that (fill in the blank) could have originated naturally. Therefore, it must have been created.” This argument, also known as the argument from ignorance or “god of the gaps,” is implicit in a very many different creationist arguments. In particular, it [...] » Continue reading “CA100: Argument from incredulity” CreationWiki, the “Encyclopedia of Creation Science”, is one of my favourite websites to visit. This is not because of its stellar content, quite on the contrary, as most of what is said there is completely false, but because it allows me to gain an understand of what creationists are thinking and saying about evolutionary theory. The reason why it is better than Answers in Genesis or Creation Ministries International in this respect is that it is a community of people who have come together as one to fight what they [...] » Continue reading “Index to Creationist Claims Introduction” |
Homologous Legs is the personal blog of Jack Scanlan, an Australian science communicator and biology student. Topics of interest here include the intelligent design/evolution "war", biology, philosophy, religion, music, and mostly coherent thoughts from a scattered brain. 
 
 |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2013 Homologous Legs - All Rights Reserved Banner graphics by Faster Pussycat Productions. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||||
Recent Comments