William Dembski is arguably seen as the most philosophically competent member of the intelligent design movement, at least by people supportive or sympathetic to ID. However, few are familiar with the gross mistakes he makes in his academic papers and books, mistakes that philosophers of science have been pointing out for over a decade, with mixed success in terms of responses from Dembski to the criticisms.
Wesley Elsberry and Jeffery Shallit add» Continue reading “Dembski’s idea of Complex Specified Information is, ironically, unspecified”
Recent Comments